Angelina Jolie - What Would You Pay?
79
A Chinese investment fund manager, Zhao Danyang, bid 2.1 million on eBay to have lunch with Warren Buffett and get stock market advice from him. Very shocking news indeed; even to Warren Buffett!
This got me thinking; what is the fair-value of a lunch? Most of us would be happy to get a free lunch, so our fair-value is about $15.
But what about a famous and attractive woman like Angelina Jolie.
Would that same fund manager pay 2.1 million to have lunch with Angelina Jolie? And if not, how much would someone else pay?
To answer this question we turn to the economic laws of demand and supply.
Demand for Angelina Jolie
The greater the demand (a shift of the red demand curve to the right), the higher the price (the point of intersection between the demand and supply curves).
From a demand or popularity standpoint, Angelina Jolie is more widely known.
- Warren Buffett has an average search volume of 74,000 searches per month on Google,
- Angelina Jolie has an amazing 1.5 million,
- Britney Spears comes in at a whooping 6.1 million searches per month, and
- Tom Cruise only gets 450,000.
It is interesting to note that Barack Obama gets an average of 1.8 million searches; higher than Angelina Jolie.
** All popularity numbers were taken from Google AdWords, as of July 2008.
Supply of Angelina Jolie
The lower the supply (a shift of the supply curve to the left), the higher the price.
Normal mortals do not have good access to Warren Buffett, Angelina Jolie, Britney Spears, or Barack Obama. So supply is limited in all those cases.
Angelina Jolie
Elasticity of Demand
Simply put, the elasticity of demand determines how much we can raise the lunch price for Angelina Jolie before you decide to drop out and lunch with someone else, or just lunch alone. Demand elasticity is dependent upon four factors:
1. Number of substitutes: The more substitutes there are, the more elastic demand is. Because there are many celebrities, I am more willing to forgo lunch with Jolie, and instead go out for lunch with Eric Estrada, at a lower price.
In contrast, there are no other fund managers with the same business savvy and magic touch as Buffett; so there are few, if any substitutes. This makes demand more inelastic and leads to a higher price.
2. % of purchaser's budget: 2.1 million may seem like a large sum to us because our total assets may not even add up to 10% of that figure. On the other hand, 2.1 million is small change to Zhao Danyang's net worth.
Because Warren Buffett's purchasers tend to be rich, they are willing to pay more for the privilege of having lunch with him. In contrast, Angelina Jolie fans, like you and me, have a lot less money, so our demand is more elastic. I.e. we are more willing to forgo lunch with Jolie.
3. Type of good: Necessities and emergency goods have more inelastic demand than luxury goods. Having lunch with a celebrity, whether it be Angelina Jolie or Warren Buffett, I think, qualifies as a luxury good. Demand therefore is more elastic.
4. Time until purchase: Does the buyer need to have lunch as soon as possible, or is there no hurry.
Zhao Danyang probably wants investment advice from Buffett as soon as possible. In this way, he stands to make more money sooner, while making fewer bad investments. Having lunch with Angelina Jolie is probably less time critical.
All this shows that demand for Angelina Jolie is a lot more elastic (flexible) than demand for Warren Buffett. Elastic demand results in a flatter demand curve (see chart), which means that price will not change much even to significant changes in demand and/or supply.
What would you pay for Angelina Jolie?
What would one pay to have lunch with Angelina Jolie?
Probably a lot less then 2.1 million. Even though there is greater demand (popularity) for Angelina Jolie, her demand is a lot more elastic.
I want to end by considering how much we would pay to have lunch with a loved-one.
In this case, demand is high, and inelastic, however, supply is also high (you generally have good access to your loved one). However, if you were to suddenly lose access, price would go up significantly.
When you go home tonight, take some time and show your loved ones how much you appreciate them. Just because you have access, does not mean you should take them for granted.
Join the HubPages community and make money from your cool ideas and stories.
CommentsLoading...
the chinese dude was there to grill warren for secrets.. it was a business investment to him (he took notes). lunch with angelina is a totally flakey thing, what would you get out of it? probably nothing. you need to ask concrete questions: how much to kiss angelina, how much to ____ angelina, and how much to marry angelina - *then* we would see some numbers!
i would pay her my heart
Dammit! **throws rock at Toms head**
Gimel! I win!!!
Oh crap!!! Rock, Scisor, paper!!! duel to the death!
Someone did pay to have lunch with angelina jolie through a charity auction.
http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/new
"Angelina Jolie is in hot water with the Lili Claire Foundation. Apparently, someone at a fundraiser paid $30,000 for a meet-and-greet with Angie...and neither the meeting nor the greeting ever took place. Now the fan has brought a lawsuit against the charity, and he's naming Angie as a co-defendant. He better watch his back—she may meet-and-shank him!"
I am a little old Jewish man. I will kick your ass at the dreidle game.
Well i am one up on you then, Tom. I am a level 82 dragon slayer on runescape! My skillz are mad!
Or lack thereof, Teresa.
I can just see my lunch with Ms. Jolie.
Me: "Uh, hi."
Ms. Jolie: "So, what do you do for a living?"
Me: "Uh, locksmith."
It would not be good. I am smart enough to know my limitations. I would pass up the opportunity if it were free of charge.
Glad I found this -- I got here via your armpit (well -- you know what I mean). I suppose Demand Elasticity also relies on foundation garments, in the case of Ms. Jolie.
Very interesting analysis and a fun read. I like the thought that went into it. Madonna recently auctioned off a private concert for $560,000, (two songs). So, basically over a half a million dollars for less than ten minutes of work. Gotta like that!
There is a much easier way to break this down, it is just a matter of what someone is willing to pay and what the other is willing to take. Nothing more!
a well-seeded observation and interesting hypothetical proposal indeed! lol.
Looks like we need more angelina jolie to meet demand. Solve this problem and you'll become a billionare :)
Can you elaborate on the likely impact on prices if the lunch is on the beach and she is wearing a string bikini vs. in an indoor restaurant and she is wearing pants and a turtleneck sweater? I am thinking that is a "type of good" difference. :)

























shibashake Hub Author 2 years ago
You want to marry angelina? That would be pretty scary ;)
I would rather marry Warren :)